<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eternal Warrior #25: It&#8217;s a Blue World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/title-eternal-warrior-25-its-a-blue-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/title-eternal-warrior-25-its-a-blue-world/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RexDart</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/title-eternal-warrior-25-its-a-blue-world/comment-page-1/#comment-163523</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RexDart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 16:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=30178#comment-163523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A power-less version of the deck would look something like the list I played back in Classic, which you can find at this link: http://www.mtgoacademy.com/eternal-warrior-6-whitey-ford-sings-the-blues/

You can see that I ran Lotus Petals instead of Moxen and also had Talisman of Dominance that I could play off an Ancient Tomb to get a Turn 2 Tezz.  In that way, it was much more like the Legacy Tezzeret decks.  The basic idea of having a control-combo deck with a backup plan of beating down with 5/5 creatures is the same, it&#039;s just much more efficient and explosive with Power.

That Classic version of the deck needed a lot more tuning, I spent about two weeks trying out half a dozen blue decks and decided on that because I thought it was the most fun and had a shot in a field of other planeswalker decks.  It also should have had a Vampiric Tutor in it, looking back now.  Maybe I hadn&#039;t bought that card yet as of the time that I had to register the decklist for that season&#039;s league.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A power-less version of the deck would look something like the list I played back in Classic, which you can find at this link: <a href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/eternal-warrior-6-whitey-ford-sings-the-blues/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/eternal-warrior-6-whitey-ford-sings-the-blues/</a></p>
<p>You can see that I ran Lotus Petals instead of Moxen and also had Talisman of Dominance that I could play off an Ancient Tomb to get a Turn 2 Tezz.  In that way, it was much more like the Legacy Tezzeret decks.  The basic idea of having a control-combo deck with a backup plan of beating down with 5/5 creatures is the same, it&#8217;s just much more efficient and explosive with Power.</p>
<p>That Classic version of the deck needed a lot more tuning, I spent about two weeks trying out half a dozen blue decks and decided on that because I thought it was the most fun and had a shot in a field of other planeswalker decks.  It also should have had a Vampiric Tutor in it, looking back now.  Maybe I hadn&#8217;t bought that card yet as of the time that I had to register the decklist for that season&#8217;s league.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winter.Wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/title-eternal-warrior-25-its-a-blue-world/comment-page-1/#comment-163126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Winter.Wolf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 07:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=30178#comment-163126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you see this as a deck that could be budgeted down? I am curious what such a deck would look like sans power and maybe with a few more counters...Also how does this meld with the metalworker decks?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you see this as a deck that could be budgeted down? I am curious what such a deck would look like sans power and maybe with a few more counters&#8230;Also how does this meld with the metalworker decks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RexDart</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/title-eternal-warrior-25-its-a-blue-world/comment-page-1/#comment-162266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RexDart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 16:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=30178#comment-162266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, Snapcaster is totally viable.  A bunch of blue decks are playing two copies, including the extremely popular UR Delver/Pyromancer/Gush deck.  

In another type of deck, I would likely be using Snapcaster in the place of Strixes -- they both essentially draw you a card and can trade with a lot of the creatures in the format.  But in Tezzeret and in Goblin Welder decks, I use the Strixes instead for their obvious synergies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Snapcaster is totally viable.  A bunch of blue decks are playing two copies, including the extremely popular UR Delver/Pyromancer/Gush deck.  </p>
<p>In another type of deck, I would likely be using Snapcaster in the place of Strixes &#8212; they both essentially draw you a card and can trade with a lot of the creatures in the format.  But in Tezzeret and in Goblin Welder decks, I use the Strixes instead for their obvious synergies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Roads</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/title-eternal-warrior-25-its-a-blue-world/comment-page-1/#comment-161945</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Roads]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 11:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=30178#comment-161945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is snapcaster not viable?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is snapcaster not viable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
