<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unlocking the Vault #15: A Classic Celebration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/unlocking-the-vault-15-a-classic-celebration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/unlocking-the-vault-15-a-classic-celebration/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: enderfall</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/unlocking-the-vault-15-a-classic-celebration/comment-page-1/#comment-7012</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[enderfall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14882#comment-7012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brad, Thanks for your note. I guess I&#039;m the only person that has ever thought to themselves, gee if I only had one card... but anyway, if you look just before the videos, I note some instances where I had made a mistake (and not noted it in the video itself). This was something that was suggested a couple weeks back and if you can think of a better way to present this, I&#039;m open to ideas. Sorry that you missed them the first time around.

Cockhorse, yes, round 4 was strange indeed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad, Thanks for your note. I guess I&#8217;m the only person that has ever thought to themselves, gee if I only had one card&#8230; but anyway, if you look just before the videos, I note some instances where I had made a mistake (and not noted it in the video itself). This was something that was suggested a couple weeks back and if you can think of a better way to present this, I&#8217;m open to ideas. Sorry that you missed them the first time around.</p>
<p>Cockhorse, yes, round 4 was strange indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/unlocking-the-vault-15-a-classic-celebration/comment-page-1/#comment-7009</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14882#comment-7009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it actually made me mad watching this. especially against the affinity deck when you made the slight complaint about not drawing what you needed..dont endstep a brainstorm especially if your not planning on using mana on your turn. you brainstorm on your turn to get 1 card deeper and you had a fetch so you woulda got to shuffle away 2 bad cards and see 4 cards that turn. what you did by not cracking fetchlands and redrawing cards that werent the answer cost you the affinity match.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it actually made me mad watching this. especially against the affinity deck when you made the slight complaint about not drawing what you needed..dont endstep a brainstorm especially if your not planning on using mana on your turn. you brainstorm on your turn to get 1 card deeper and you had a fetch so you woulda got to shuffle away 2 bad cards and see 4 cards that turn. what you did by not cracking fetchlands and redrawing cards that werent the answer cost you the affinity match.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cock Horse</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/unlocking-the-vault-15-a-classic-celebration/comment-page-1/#comment-7002</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cock Horse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 01:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14882#comment-7002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hoooooly f*** round 4 was funny; what a deck
and so gorgeous how everything was so good against you. The knight actually stops your whole team.
Grizzly bears are terrifying in this format!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hoooooly f*** round 4 was funny; what a deck<br />
and so gorgeous how everything was so good against you. The knight actually stops your whole team.<br />
Grizzly bears are terrifying in this format!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enderfall</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/unlocking-the-vault-15-a-classic-celebration/comment-page-1/#comment-7001</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[enderfall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 01:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14882#comment-7001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi CSeraph, could you specifically point out when in Round 1 you are referring to when you say that I held up Delver for a misstep? I don&#039;t see any instance where I held up a Delver for a Misstep, except that I did not run my Delver out on turn 1 in game 1 in the face of a potential counter war or an Oath deck, as I didn&#039;t know what deck my opponent was playing at the time. No sense in fighting over a Delver in a meta running wild with Oath of Druids. Nothing is worse than losing simply because you played a one-mana dork and your opponent opens with land, lotus petal, Oath and counter back-up. I may have missed something, but I&#039;m just curious. Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi CSeraph, could you specifically point out when in Round 1 you are referring to when you say that I held up Delver for a misstep? I don&#8217;t see any instance where I held up a Delver for a Misstep, except that I did not run my Delver out on turn 1 in game 1 in the face of a potential counter war or an Oath deck, as I didn&#8217;t know what deck my opponent was playing at the time. No sense in fighting over a Delver in a meta running wild with Oath of Druids. Nothing is worse than losing simply because you played a one-mana dork and your opponent opens with land, lotus petal, Oath and counter back-up. I may have missed something, but I&#8217;m just curious. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CSeraph</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/unlocking-the-vault-15-a-classic-celebration/comment-page-1/#comment-7000</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CSeraph]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14882#comment-7000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your decision-making could use some work. Watching round 1 - Brainstorming EOT when you have a fetchland in hand is usually wrong. Not playing a delver to hold up mental misstep (??) when you are a delver deck is just straight up incorrect.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your decision-making could use some work. Watching round 1 &#8211; Brainstorming EOT when you have a fetchland in hand is usually wrong. Not playing a delver to hold up mental misstep (??) when you are a delver deck is just straight up incorrect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
