<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unlocking the Vault #55: Introducing the FINAL Classic Invitational</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/unlocking-the-vault-55-introducing-the-final-classic-invitational/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/unlocking-the-vault-55-introducing-the-final-classic-invitational/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: enderfall</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/unlocking-the-vault-55-introducing-the-final-classic-invitational/comment-page-1/#comment-80524</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[enderfall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2014 21:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=27394#comment-80524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, it&#039;s definitely a different deck without Wasteland. As you mention, Wasteland is a pillar of Legacy/Vintage/Classic, so someone buying in would do well to start there since the rest of this deck is fairly cheap.

Regarding Mage, it&#039;s probably a card that requires major changes to the deck. The mana denial plan would probably have to be scrapped for a permission suite, but that would give you access to Force of Will (which is a pretty good card I hear). I have also tried a &quot;Wizards&quot; deck, and it wasn&#039;t anything special. Perhaps we&#039;ll get some new cards in the future to that make it better, but right now it&#039;s not quite there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it&#8217;s definitely a different deck without Wasteland. As you mention, Wasteland is a pillar of Legacy/Vintage/Classic, so someone buying in would do well to start there since the rest of this deck is fairly cheap.</p>
<p>Regarding Mage, it&#8217;s probably a card that requires major changes to the deck. The mana denial plan would probably have to be scrapped for a permission suite, but that would give you access to Force of Will (which is a pretty good card I hear). I have also tried a &#8220;Wizards&#8221; deck, and it wasn&#8217;t anything special. Perhaps we&#8217;ll get some new cards in the future to that make it better, but right now it&#8217;s not quite there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FishyFellow</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/unlocking-the-vault-55-introducing-the-final-classic-invitational/comment-page-1/#comment-80405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FishyFellow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2014 06:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=27394#comment-80405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott, you&#039;re crazy! ;)  I like the Meddling Mage plan, but for a different deck.  The mana denial of this build doesn&#039;t interact well with fetches (arbiter).  I think a UW build utilizing Hussar would probably be a human/wizard build with a tool box of answers and cards like trinket mage.  I&#039;ve also played hussar in mono blue wizards to some success, but I suspect the deck is too slow right now.  That was several years ago.

As far as budget goes, I don&#039;t think the deck is playable without wasteland.  Mana denial is probably the source of the majority of the wins.  Even if it doesn&#039;t directly win the game, it buys some time while you build card advantage.  That said, the rest of the deck costs less than 100 tix, so someone interested in Classic/Vintage couldn&#039;t go wrong with wasteland as a first staple to pick up, and build the rest of the deck on the cheap.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, you&#8217;re crazy! <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";)" class="wp-smiley" />   I like the Meddling Mage plan, but for a different deck.  The mana denial of this build doesn&#8217;t interact well with fetches (arbiter).  I think a UW build utilizing Hussar would probably be a human/wizard build with a tool box of answers and cards like trinket mage.  I&#8217;ve also played hussar in mono blue wizards to some success, but I suspect the deck is too slow right now.  That was several years ago.</p>
<p>As far as budget goes, I don&#8217;t think the deck is playable without wasteland.  Mana denial is probably the source of the majority of the wins.  Even if it doesn&#8217;t directly win the game, it buys some time while you build card advantage.  That said, the rest of the deck costs less than 100 tix, so someone interested in Classic/Vintage couldn&#8217;t go wrong with wasteland as a first staple to pick up, and build the rest of the deck on the cheap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
