<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s Your Daddy?: This Blood&#8217;s for You!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/whos-your-daddy-this-bloods-for-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/whos-your-daddy-this-bloods-for-you/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheCHILDofAlara</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/whos-your-daddy-this-bloods-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-7233</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheCHILDofAlara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14499#comment-7233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Travis,
I&#039;m just wondering what your new deck was going to be about, and I thought of a General/Commander that seems to follow the Combo-Oriented Style of the decks you have posted recently. This General would be: Riku of Two Reflections. This guy practically screams BROKEN! He (Or rather THEY...) serve as a &quot;Mirari&quot; and a never-ending clone... I&#039;ve been brewing up something with this General, and found him to be great with spells like &quot;Time Warp&quot; and &quot;Temporal Manipulation&quot;. He could also be used to copy small rampant growths, or as a finisher: &quot;Searing Wind&quot;. While RUG isn&#039;t the strongest of color combinations, I predict that Riku could bring the best of those three colors together and combo-out very quickly.
Please let me know, and happy brewing!
-TheCHILDofAlara]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Travis,<br />
I&#8217;m just wondering what your new deck was going to be about, and I thought of a General/Commander that seems to follow the Combo-Oriented Style of the decks you have posted recently. This General would be: Riku of Two Reflections. This guy practically screams BROKEN! He (Or rather THEY&#8230;) serve as a &#8220;Mirari&#8221; and a never-ending clone&#8230; I&#8217;ve been brewing up something with this General, and found him to be great with spells like &#8220;Time Warp&#8221; and &#8220;Temporal Manipulation&#8221;. He could also be used to copy small rampant growths, or as a finisher: &#8220;Searing Wind&#8221;. While RUG isn&#8217;t the strongest of color combinations, I predict that Riku could bring the best of those three colors together and combo-out very quickly.<br />
Please let me know, and happy brewing!<br />
-TheCHILDofAlara</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xyx</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/whos-your-daddy-this-bloods-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-6886</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xyx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 01:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14499#comment-6886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hope you get back to this nonsense sometime.  I miss listening to people complaining about people complaining about the format.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope you get back to this nonsense sometime.  I miss listening to people complaining about people complaining about the format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/whos-your-daddy-this-bloods-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-6848</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 04:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14499#comment-6848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i know this is a long shot, but I have a really cool commander deck that you should check out.  I have it in paper but its a bitch to play in real life and I can&#039;t afford it online.

http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/showthread.php?t=300879]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i know this is a long shot, but I have a really cool commander deck that you should check out.  I have it in paper but its a bitch to play in real life and I can&#8217;t afford it online.</p>
<p><a href="http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/showthread.php?t=300879" rel="nofollow">http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/showthread.php?t=300879</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis R. Chance</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/whos-your-daddy-this-bloods-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-6721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis R. Chance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14499#comment-6721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taking a break from this nonsense for a good long while.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taking a break from this nonsense for a good long while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eXXa</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/whos-your-daddy-this-bloods-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-6660</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eXXa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 21:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14499#comment-6660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where a you man? :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where a you man? <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif" alt=":(" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis R. Chance</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/whos-your-daddy-this-bloods-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-6591</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis R. Chance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14499#comment-6591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Josh,

This is a mana intensive deck.  Mind&#039;s Eye doesn&#039;t help in this punishing economy.  Cost doesn&#039;t give me the constant flow.  There wasn&#039;t much in the high end I had to forgo for these cards, also.  And, lastly,  I guess you just ignored the multiple comments in this forum and in the video where I cite the risk vs. reward, justifying it as something I wanted to try out after many times of benching them.  It was an experiment, factoring in the high starting life total of the format and ability to swing over starting life easily.  

Not a good listener, eh?  Or are you just hear to puff your chest and seem smarter than you are?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh,</p>
<p>This is a mana intensive deck.  Mind&#8217;s Eye doesn&#8217;t help in this punishing economy.  Cost doesn&#8217;t give me the constant flow.  There wasn&#8217;t much in the high end I had to forgo for these cards, also.  And, lastly,  I guess you just ignored the multiple comments in this forum and in the video where I cite the risk vs. reward, justifying it as something I wanted to try out after many times of benching them.  It was an experiment, factoring in the high starting life total of the format and ability to swing over starting life easily.  </p>
<p>Not a good listener, eh?  Or are you just hear to puff your chest and seem smarter than you are?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/whos-your-daddy-this-bloods-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-6582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=14499#comment-6582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[why not just run ambitions cost and mind&#039;s eye?? it seems soooo much better than tutelage and confidant.  2 cards that probably aren&#039;&#039;t even good anyways are completely constricting what you can play in your deck.   It seems like a really bad idea.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why not just run ambitions cost and mind&#8217;s eye?? it seems soooo much better than tutelage and confidant.  2 cards that probably aren&#8221;t even good anyways are completely constricting what you can play in your deck.   It seems like a really bad idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
