<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windmill Slam &#8211; Legacy Cube Swiss</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/windmill-slam-legacy-cube-swiss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/windmill-slam-legacy-cube-swiss/</link>
	<description>The prime source for Magic the Gathering strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shendue</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/windmill-slam-legacy-cube-swiss/comment-page-1/#comment-217152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shendue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 23:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=31971#comment-217152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you ever play Skullcrack at all, Anonymous? The damage is just a plus, the best thing about the card is preventing your opponent from gaining life, which wins you lots of games with some matchups if you do it at the right moment.
My only complaint about this draft is adding Mirran Crusader to it. Double white 3-drop in what&#039;s basically a mono red deck? Uh...that sounds like a terrible idea.
Seeker is also a little bit cute. I would have limited the splash at just Boros Charm and Helix.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever play Skullcrack at all, Anonymous? The damage is just a plus, the best thing about the card is preventing your opponent from gaining life, which wins you lots of games with some matchups if you do it at the right moment.<br />
My only complaint about this draft is adding Mirran Crusader to it. Double white 3-drop in what&#8217;s basically a mono red deck? Uh&#8230;that sounds like a terrible idea.<br />
Seeker is also a little bit cute. I would have limited the splash at just Boros Charm and Helix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zack</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/windmill-slam-legacy-cube-swiss/comment-page-1/#comment-210701</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 01:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=31971#comment-210701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh anonymous, you&#039;re always the most friendly.  I like my entertainment funny and less predictable thank you :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh anonymous, you&#8217;re always the most friendly.  I like my entertainment funny and less predictable thank you <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/windmill-slam-legacy-cube-swiss/comment-page-1/#comment-210688</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=31971#comment-210688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, could someone explain the reason behind picking Skullcrack over Madcap Skills? It seems to me that Skullcrack will always deal 3 damage, whereas Madcap Skills will, generally at least, deal a minimum of 3 damage, possibly more, or will often at least result in the ability to trade a creature for 2 of an opponent&#039;s creatures. Not to mention the fact that he was saying the whole time that he wanted equipment, and madcap skills being pretty similar to an equipment card. He even said right after that pick that Madcap skills would have been good in the deck, but he still picked, essentially, an overpriced lightning bolt over it.

Don&#039;t even get me started on passing archangel and two different Ajanis in a deck that wants to boost power. Warhammer was reasonable, since it might have wheeled.

I&#039;m not usually the type to complain about stuff like this but, if you didn&#039;t want to make a white/something deck focused around buffing your creatures, then you shouldn&#039;t have said you were trying to. Make a plan, stick to it, and don&#039;t try to draft burn in the same video as saying that burn isn&#039;t a viable strategy.

I haven&#039;t actually watched the games yet, but I wanted to say this while it was fresh in my mind. Gonna go back to the videos now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, could someone explain the reason behind picking Skullcrack over Madcap Skills? It seems to me that Skullcrack will always deal 3 damage, whereas Madcap Skills will, generally at least, deal a minimum of 3 damage, possibly more, or will often at least result in the ability to trade a creature for 2 of an opponent&#8217;s creatures. Not to mention the fact that he was saying the whole time that he wanted equipment, and madcap skills being pretty similar to an equipment card. He even said right after that pick that Madcap skills would have been good in the deck, but he still picked, essentially, an overpriced lightning bolt over it.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t even get me started on passing archangel and two different Ajanis in a deck that wants to boost power. Warhammer was reasonable, since it might have wheeled.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not usually the type to complain about stuff like this but, if you didn&#8217;t want to make a white/something deck focused around buffing your creatures, then you shouldn&#8217;t have said you were trying to. Make a plan, stick to it, and don&#8217;t try to draft burn in the same video as saying that burn isn&#8217;t a viable strategy.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t actually watched the games yet, but I wanted to say this while it was fresh in my mind. Gonna go back to the videos now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/windmill-slam-legacy-cube-swiss/comment-page-1/#comment-210618</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 18:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=31971#comment-210618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Sam Roads
Especially since they&#039;re both low skill noobs who shouldn&#039;t be on a place called &quot;Academy&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sam Roads<br />
Especially since they&#8217;re both low skill noobs who shouldn&#8217;t be on a place called &#8220;Academy&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HelicalScorn</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/windmill-slam-legacy-cube-swiss/comment-page-1/#comment-210615</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HelicalScorn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 18:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=31971#comment-210615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You could have run the Tundra as one of your plains, which could havee been searched up by your Scalding Tarn.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could have run the Tundra as one of your plains, which could havee been searched up by your Scalding Tarn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Roads</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/windmill-slam-legacy-cube-swiss/comment-page-1/#comment-210598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Roads]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=31971#comment-210598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Windmill Slam is the two of you and your messing about. With only one it loses its charm. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windmill Slam is the two of you and your messing about. With only one it loses its charm. <img src="http://www.mtgoacademy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tuntun</title>
		<link>http://www.mtgoacademy.com/windmill-slam-legacy-cube-swiss/comment-page-1/#comment-210261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tuntun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 12:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtgoacademy.com/?p=31971#comment-210261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[what a terrible first pack.. geez...

taking and banishing light then passing a arid mesa for a fanatic =/

passing rishadan port to take a unplayable..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what a terrible first pack.. geez&#8230;</p>
<p>taking and banishing light then passing a arid mesa for a fanatic =/</p>
<p>passing rishadan port to take a unplayable..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
